1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4549(98)00019-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a tube-based bundle CHF prediction method using a subchannel code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, only K 1 , K 4 and K 5 are encoded into CTF. K 2 is not currently considered as individual subchannel geometry is already being accounted for [103]. Likewise, K 6 and K 7 are not considered because cross-flow Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs 188 CASL-U-2019-1886-002 and non-uniform radial heating is already being accounted for.…”
Section: Groeneveld Look-up Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, only K 1 , K 4 and K 5 are encoded into CTF. K 2 is not currently considered as individual subchannel geometry is already being accounted for [103]. Likewise, K 6 and K 7 are not considered because cross-flow Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs 188 CASL-U-2019-1886-002 and non-uniform radial heating is already being accounted for.…”
Section: Groeneveld Look-up Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, only K 1 , K 4 and K 5 are encoded into CTF. K 2 is not currently considered as individual subchannel geometry is already being accounted for [84]. Likewise, K 6 and K 7 are not considered because cross-flow Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs 160 CASL-U-2018-1715-000 and non-uniform radial heating is already being accounted for.…”
Section: Groeneveld Look-up Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, only K 1 , K 4 and K 5 are encoded into CTF. K 2 is not currently considered as individual subchannel geometry is already being accounted for [13]. Likewise, K 6 and K 7 are not considered because cross-flow and nonuniform radial heating is already being accounted for.…”
Section: Groeneveld Look-up Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%