2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2010.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a RELAP5 model for the IPR-R1 TRIGA research reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RELAP5 model developed for IPR-R1 reactor showed a good agreement with the experimental data for 50 kW steady state, but not for loss of flow transient condition [10]. The improvement of the model by dividing the reactor pool into two regions with a cross flow model between both regions showed a better transient calculation result [7]. A sensitivity study on the core model of IPR-R1 showed that better coolant temperature prediction was obtained with increasing number of core channels and cross flow models [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RELAP5 model developed for IPR-R1 reactor showed a good agreement with the experimental data for 50 kW steady state, but not for loss of flow transient condition [10]. The improvement of the model by dividing the reactor pool into two regions with a cross flow model between both regions showed a better transient calculation result [7]. A sensitivity study on the core model of IPR-R1 showed that better coolant temperature prediction was obtained with increasing number of core channels and cross flow models [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Many of these computational tools or codes are initially developed for a nuclear power reactor, such as RELAP5, ATHLET and CATHARE codes. However, several study have been done to assess the applicability of these codes for different type of research reactors, especially MTR type [3][4][5][6], TRIGA type [7], and also for other nuclear test facilities [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, with the calculation codes such as: APROS, RELAP, CATHARE, and ATHLET it has become possible to provide the thermal hydraulic behavior of the facilities and to reproduce the physical phenomena occurring during normal and accidental operation (Nematollahi and Zare, 2008;Reis et al, 2010). These computer codes are the result of scientific research conducted for several decades by international collaboration in the field of safety and design of nuclear power plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a subcooled boiling model of upward vertical flow consistent with phenomenological observations of the subcooled flow boiling mechanisms was proposed to extend the range of applicability of the RELAP5 code to low pressures (Končar and Mavko, 2003). Therefore, recent works as, for example (Antariksawan et al, 2005;Khedr et al, 2005;Marcum et al, 2010;Reis et al, 2010), have been performed to investigate the applicability of the RELAP5 code to research reactors operating conditions (TRIGA 2000, MTR, Oregon State TRIGA, IPR-R1 TRIGA), respectively. Application of a model for the IPR-R1 TRIGA using the RELAP5 code is detailed in the Annex B.…”
Section: Thermal Hydraulic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%