2016
DOI: 10.5539/enrr.v6n2p28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a Regional-Scale Weather Model for Hydrological Applications in South Korea

Abstract: In this study, a regional numerical weather prediction (NWP) model known as the Weather Research Forescasting (WRF) model was adopted to improve the quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) by optimizing combined microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Noah and Noah-MP land surface models (Niu et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2011) are the most commonly used for glacier studies (Claremar et al, 2012;Aas et al, 2016;Collier et al, 2015Collier et al, , 2018Gerber et al, 2018), but the WRF simulations can depend substantially on which of the two land surface models is used (Milovac et al, 2016). Similarly, the Grell 3D Ensemble cumulus scheme together with the Thompson microphysics scheme have been shown to work best over mountainous terrain, whereas the Kain-Frisch cumulus scheme with Thompson microphysics worked best over the plains (Jung and Lin, 2016). These mentioned examples highlight the importance of a sensitivity analysis regarding the choice of WRF physics parameterization schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Noah and Noah-MP land surface models (Niu et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2011) are the most commonly used for glacier studies (Claremar et al, 2012;Aas et al, 2016;Collier et al, 2015Collier et al, , 2018Gerber et al, 2018), but the WRF simulations can depend substantially on which of the two land surface models is used (Milovac et al, 2016). Similarly, the Grell 3D Ensemble cumulus scheme together with the Thompson microphysics scheme have been shown to work best over mountainous terrain, whereas the Kain-Frisch cumulus scheme with Thompson microphysics worked best over the plains (Jung and Lin, 2016). These mentioned examples highlight the importance of a sensitivity analysis regarding the choice of WRF physics parameterization schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Noah (Tewari et al, 2004) and Noah-MP land surface models (Niu et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2011) are the most commonly used in glacier studies, but the WRF simulations over non-glacierized terrain are shown to vary substantially depending on which of the two land surface models is used (Milovac et al, 2016). The WRF model is not only sensitive to the choice of parameterization scheme in each category, but also to their combination across different categories (Jung and Lin, 2016). While WRF sensitivity to the choice of physics parameterisations has been explored extensively in studies on climate dynamics and related disciplines, to our knowledge no systematic sensitivity analysis has been conducted for glacier melt modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%