1992
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90126-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a computer program to detect epileptiform spikes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ö zdamar et al [23] have reported similarly good results for sensitivity (90%), but selectivity is relatively low (69%). On the other hand, Hostetler et al [24] have achieved a good result for selectivity at 89%, but not for sensitivity, which is at 59%. Although Dingle et al [7] have given a very good result for false detection rate per hour (2%), the sensitivity is very low (14%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Ö zdamar et al [23] have reported similarly good results for sensitivity (90%), but selectivity is relatively low (69%). On the other hand, Hostetler et al [24] have achieved a good result for selectivity at 89%, but not for sensitivity, which is at 59%. Although Dingle et al [7] have given a very good result for false detection rate per hour (2%), the sensitivity is very low (14%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We chose an approach based on event detection for two reasons: first, event detection has constantly been a basic tool for both visual and automatic EEG scoring; then, significant advancements in automatic event detection have been recently achieved. In fact, a number of efficacious methods have been proposed, based on mimetic analysis (Hostetler et al 1992;Gotman and Wang 1992;Dingle et al 1993), mathematical transforms including wavelets (Quiroga and Schürmann 1999;Senhagij and Wendling 2002;Adjouadi et al 2005;Largo and Rosa 2005), adaptive time-frequency approximation through the matching pursuit algorithm (Mallat and Zhang 1993;Durka et al 2004;_ Zygierewicz et al 2005), artificial neural networks (Acir et al 2005;Ventouras et al 2005), fuzzy reasoning (Huupponen et al 2005), polynomial modeling (Bigan and Woolfson 2000), and data mining (Exarchos et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes visual inspection subjective, difficult and time consuming. Visual inspection lacks the ability to anahttp://france.elsevier.com/direct/RBMRET/ ITBM-RBM 27 (2006) [19][20][21][22][23][24] lyze quantitatively so as to explain hidden details of the signal [1,2]. In clinical practice, type of seizure suffered by patient is typically determined by the physician using subjective analysis of the patient or his attendee.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%