2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1319-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a bedside test for N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to differentiate cardiac from non-cardiac causes of pleural effusion in cats

Abstract: BackgroundCats with pleural effusion represent common emergencies in small animal practice. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the diagnostic ability of a point-of-care ELISA (POC-ELISA) for the measurement of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to differentiate cardiac from non-cardiac disease in cats with pleural effusion. The sample material for use of this rapid test was either plasma or diluted pleural effusion.Twenty cats with moderate to severe pleural effusion were p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The moderate to high rate of false positives in the pleural fluid tests suggests that blood samples are preferred over pleural fluid samples for POC NT‐proBNP testing, and corroborates previous studies suggesting that the POC NT‐proBNP test appears to be most helpful in ruling out (rather than ruling in) CHF in cats with respiratory distress . However, diluting pleural fluid 1 : 1 with saline may increase the specificity of POC NT‐proBNP performed on PLEFF samples but this dilution technique was not used in our study. The advantage of the POC NT‐proBNP is its relatively low cost (as compared with an ultrasound unit), as well as the speed and ease of performing the test and interpreting results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The moderate to high rate of false positives in the pleural fluid tests suggests that blood samples are preferred over pleural fluid samples for POC NT‐proBNP testing, and corroborates previous studies suggesting that the POC NT‐proBNP test appears to be most helpful in ruling out (rather than ruling in) CHF in cats with respiratory distress . However, diluting pleural fluid 1 : 1 with saline may increase the specificity of POC NT‐proBNP performed on PLEFF samples but this dilution technique was not used in our study. The advantage of the POC NT‐proBNP is its relatively low cost (as compared with an ultrasound unit), as well as the speed and ease of performing the test and interpreting results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The quantitative feline‐specific NT‐proBNP assay using plasma or pleural fluid has good diagnostic accuracy for discriminating between cats with cardiac and noncardiac causes of respiratory distress (LOE high), but it is not recommended for guiding therapeutic decision‐making in cats with respiratory distress because of the delay in receiving test results from an external laboratory. Instead, a point‐of‐care NT‐proBNP assay provides rapid results while maintaining reasonable diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between cardiac and noncardiac causes of respiratory distress, and should be considered when point‐of‐care ultrasound examination is not available (LOE medium) . The point‐of‐care assay can be used on plasma or pleural fluid, the latter diluted 1:1 with saline for greater specificity …”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, a point‐of‐care NT‐proBNP assay provides rapid results while maintaining reasonable diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between cardiac and noncardiac causes of respiratory distress, and should be considered when point‐of‐care ultrasound examination is not available (LOE medium) . The point‐of‐care assay can be used on plasma or pleural fluid, the latter diluted 1:1 with saline for greater specificity …”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study has shown that a point-of-care test measuring NT-proBNP in diluted pleural effusion (1:1 pleural effusion to 0.9% saline solution) was suitable to distinguish cardiogenic causes from non-cardiogenic causes of pleural effusion. However, this method was not performed in pleural fluid samples in this study [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%