2016
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
43
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This new situation requires numerous variables to be taken into consideration. Aspects such as participation (Falchikov 2005), students' evaluative judgement (Boud et al 2018a, b), selfregulation (Hawe and Dixon 2017;Panadero et al 2017), feedback (Boud and Molloy 2013;Nicol et al 2014), a climate of trust (Carless 2009(Carless , 2013 and the quality of the assessment (Sadler 2016) are all elements that play a vital role in assessment practice. In this study, we focus primarily on the two elements that can be considered as basic to peer assessment: student participation and their evaluative judgement.…”
Section: Framework and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new situation requires numerous variables to be taken into consideration. Aspects such as participation (Falchikov 2005), students' evaluative judgement (Boud et al 2018a, b), selfregulation (Hawe and Dixon 2017;Panadero et al 2017), feedback (Boud and Molloy 2013;Nicol et al 2014), a climate of trust (Carless 2009(Carless , 2013 and the quality of the assessment (Sadler 2016) are all elements that play a vital role in assessment practice. In this study, we focus primarily on the two elements that can be considered as basic to peer assessment: student participation and their evaluative judgement.…”
Section: Framework and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is consensus that formative assessment for learning (AfL) methods are a high-impact instructional practice, and perhaps one of the most effective interventions to increase student learning [2]. AfL methods provide ongoing diagnosis and feedback about in-progress learning, through interactions between the learners, their peers and the teachers [3]. AfL can be described as an iterative and reflective feedback loop where progress towards the learning goals are monitored, and adaptions in practices are made to achieve those learning goals.…”
Section: Assessment For Learning (Afl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, Lifelong Learning is often viewed as an ominous attribute that is difficult to teach and measure [5]. However, AfL practices have been shown to develop self-regulation in learners which is a skill that helps to foster effective lifelong learning [3]. For this reason, it is important to consider how we can bring more AfL practices into engineering.…”
Section: Assessment For Learning (Afl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as Henderson and Trede (2017) note, the academic responsible for organising placement learning is commonly distant from the student's work place, so not a direct witness to that learning. As such it could be argued, for example, that the student will know better what they have or have not learnt and this, in turn, could suggest a central role for self or student peers in the design of work placement assessment (Hawe & Dixon, 2016). Observations such as these prompt the question: how best might planning practitioners, academics and students collaborate to more fairly and accurately assess students' work placement learning?…”
Section: Assessment and Academic Standards In Work Placement-based Lementioning
confidence: 99%