2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-012-9425-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment for Effective Intervention: Enrichment Science Academic Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, previous research has suggested that out‐of‐school encounters have the potential to offer several emotional benefits such as increased joy and excitement (Rennie & McClafferty, ), increased well‐being, less anger, less anxiety, and less boredom (Randler, Ilg, & Kern, ). However, the majority of studies that have analyzed the effects of SCOL visits (Hausamann, ; Thomas, ) and related learning settings (Rennie, ; Sasson, ; Sasson & Cohen, ) on students’ learning performance and motivation have had some limitations. Previous studies have relied on small sample sizes ( N < 400) with the exception of Sasson and Cohen () as well as Seybold, Braunbeck, and Randler () and several did not use a randomized design implemented in a multilevel context, with the exception of, for example, Itzek‐Greulich et al ().…”
Section: Activity Emotions and Motivational Outcomes In A Science Clamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, previous research has suggested that out‐of‐school encounters have the potential to offer several emotional benefits such as increased joy and excitement (Rennie & McClafferty, ), increased well‐being, less anger, less anxiety, and less boredom (Randler, Ilg, & Kern, ). However, the majority of studies that have analyzed the effects of SCOL visits (Hausamann, ; Thomas, ) and related learning settings (Rennie, ; Sasson, ; Sasson & Cohen, ) on students’ learning performance and motivation have had some limitations. Previous studies have relied on small sample sizes ( N < 400) with the exception of Sasson and Cohen () as well as Seybold, Braunbeck, and Randler () and several did not use a randomized design implemented in a multilevel context, with the exception of, for example, Itzek‐Greulich et al ().…”
Section: Activity Emotions and Motivational Outcomes In A Science Clamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of studies that have analyzed the effects of SCOL visits (Hausamann, ; Thomas, ) and related learning settings (Rennie, ; Sasson, ; Sasson & Cohen, ) on students’ learning performance and motivation have had some limitations. Previous studies have relied on small sample sizes ( N < 400) with the exception of Sasson and Cohen () as well as Seybold, Braunbeck, and Randler () and several did not use a randomized design implemented in a multilevel context, with the exception of, for example, Itzek‐Greulich et al (). Some of these studies were qualitative (Dohn, ; Jarvis & Pell, ; Luehmann, ) and did not include a control group (Sasson & Cohen, ).…”
Section: Activity Emotions and Motivational Outcomes In A Science Clamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Starting at an early age, girls display little interest in physics compared to boys (Hoffmann, 2002). Results were used for the improvement of the instructional design of the physics activities (Sasson and Cohen, 2013). Results were used for the improvement of the instructional design of the physics activities (Sasson and Cohen, 2013).…”
Section: Paper Chemistry Education Research and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The center, as a pre-academic framework, aims at strengthening the potental of school students in order to encourage them to pursue higher educaton, with an emphasis on science and technology studies. The center provides students with hands-on laboratory experience and computerized learning environments not available in their schools (Sasson & Cohen, 2013). The cooperaton with an academic and research insttute creates an opportunity for meetngs with experts as role models in science.…”
Section: Introduction and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%