2019
DOI: 10.6000/2292-2598.2019.07.03.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment, Evaluation, and Programming System for Infants and Children: What are Salient Development and Research Factors to Consider?

Abstract: Early childhood professionals are increasingly pressed to use evidence-based measures when assessing young children. Professional time and resources to investigate research is limited, and takes time away from the delivery of direct services. The literature review is to describe the progression of a widely used curriculum-based assessment (CBA), the Assessment, Evaluation, and Programming System for Infants and Children (AEPS). In addition to sharing the development of this early childhood measure, we identifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The social emotional area was the social area from the second edition. The AEPS has a long history and since its inception has included the social area, however in the AEPS-3 multiple items were changed or revised in the third edition of the AEPS-3 with many remaining the same (Macy, Chen, & Macy, 2019). Many of the parental comments in the openended section of the AEPS-3 FACS corroborate results from the strong correlations.…”
Section: Whatmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The social emotional area was the social area from the second edition. The AEPS has a long history and since its inception has included the social area, however in the AEPS-3 multiple items were changed or revised in the third edition of the AEPS-3 with many remaining the same (Macy, Chen, & Macy, 2019). Many of the parental comments in the openended section of the AEPS-3 FACS corroborate results from the strong correlations.…”
Section: Whatmentioning
confidence: 88%