2006
DOI: 10.1177/1523422305286155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment Center: A Critical Mechanism for Assessing HRD Effectiveness and Accountability

Abstract: Assessment center (AC), driven by job analysis or competency development, has long proven to have strong content-related and criterion-related validities and some construct-related validity to assess behavior, which is one important dimension for demonstrating training effectiveness and human resource development (HRD) accountability. Yet, AC has not been effectively utilized in HRD research and practice for such purposes. This article reviews research and practice of AC, discusses validity issues of ACs, iden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, studies show that assessors' skills are vital to the success of any SC process (Chen 2006). For example, both ''unqualified assessors'' and ''inadequate training'' are thought to negatively influence the validity of SCs (Chen 2006, p. 254).…”
Section: The Role Of Assessors In Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, studies show that assessors' skills are vital to the success of any SC process (Chen 2006). For example, both ''unqualified assessors'' and ''inadequate training'' are thought to negatively influence the validity of SCs (Chen 2006, p. 254).…”
Section: The Role Of Assessors In Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, assessors, and potentially simulators, can be a major source of error during an interview or selection centre process (Chen 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to using behaviorally based assessments, recruiters and hiring managers can implement an assessment center into their selection process (Arthur, Day, McNelly, & Edens, 2003; Chen, 2006). Assessment centers can vary widely in terms of duration and size, with mid- to upper-management centers typically running from 2 to 3 days with 12 potential managers, on average (Cascio & Aguinis, 2005).…”
Section: Behavioral and Psychological Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment centers (ACs) are one of the most widely used methods for personnel decision and organizational development (Chen, ; Eurich, Krause, Cigularov, & Thornton, ; Thornton & Rupp, ). ACs are designed to assess various domains of human functioning in multiple job situations (Finkle, ; Highhouse, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment centers (ACs) are one of the most widely used methods for personnel decision and organizational development (Chen, 2006;Eurich, Krause, Cigularov, & Thornton, 2009;Thornton & Rupp, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%