1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02229299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and validation of diagnostic interviewing skills for the mental health professions

Abstract: A behavioral test was developed to assess the quality of diagnostic interviewing skills of (future) mental health professionals. Two aspects of diagnostic interviewing ability are distinguished: process skills, reflecting the interpersonal and communication skills; and content skills, referring to the information-gathering ability of the interviewer. It was found that diagnostic interviewing can be reliably measured with respect to interrater reliability. Howeveg, interviewer performance on one case proved to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the data provide an excellent opportunity to evaluate the interrater reliability of PCL-R scores with a large pool of raters. Generalizability (G) theory provides a framework for evaluating measurement reliability that is more comprehensive than that of classical test theory (Bogels et al, 1995; Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda, & Tajaratnam, 1972). We calculated the variance in PCL-R ratings uniquely attributable to differences among cases (“true” variability across individuals), differences among raters (unreliability due to raters), and all other sources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the data provide an excellent opportunity to evaluate the interrater reliability of PCL-R scores with a large pool of raters. Generalizability (G) theory provides a framework for evaluating measurement reliability that is more comprehensive than that of classical test theory (Bogels et al, 1995; Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda, & Tajaratnam, 1972). We calculated the variance in PCL-R ratings uniquely attributable to differences among cases (“true” variability across individuals), differences among raters (unreliability due to raters), and all other sources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dit wordt in veel observatieonderzoek gevonden, en staat bekend als de "task specificity of behaviour" (zie bijv. Bögels et al, 1995). Een opvoedingstaak kan in die zin gezien worden als een item op een vragenlijst.…”
Section: Beperkingen Van Het Onderzoek En Conclusiesunclassified