2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and Planning for a Pediatric Bilateral Hand Transplant Using 3-Dimensional Modeling: Case Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, prosthetic hands were created to restore the donor's physique. [5,6] Utilizing 3D planning and 3D printing, Amaral et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, prosthetic hands were created to restore the donor's physique. [5,6] Utilizing 3D planning and 3D printing, Amaral et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a case of an 8-year-old child with bilateral hand surgical amputation, Galvez et al [57] selected the most appropriate size for hand transplantation using 3D printed models from different potential donors for which they determined depending on size hands and forearms matching between donor and recipient.…”
Section: Orthopedic Fixatives Orthoses and Prosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, patients should be between the ages of 18 and 65 years old; however, in July 2015, we performed a bilateral hand transplantation on an 8-year old boy who was a prior kidney transplant recipient with excellent results at 2.5 years follow-up. 1,15,26 Pediatric patient selection for hand transplantation. The various challenges of upper extremity transplantation in children include psychological assessment, informed consent, greater surgical risk, special surgical considerations to optimize complementary growth of the donor and recipient extremities, greater risk of complications from immunosuppression due to longer potential life years, 2,32 lack of objective functional and quality of life assessment tools and compliance with the exhaustive rehabilitation demands.…”
Section: The Author's Current Protocol For Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%