2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and inter-comparison of recently developed/reprocessed microwave satellite soil moisture products using ISMN ground-based measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
93
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
11
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a better calibration and understanding the main limitations of satellite soil moisture measurements across multiple environmental conditions, there is an increasing number of studies reporting validation performances across multiple scales (spatial and temporal) of available soil moisture satellite datasets (An et al, 2016;Colliander et al, 2017b;Dorigo et al, 2011b;Minet et al, 2012;Mohanty et al, 2017;Yee et al, 2016). Several reports have shown similar prediction bias (e.g., similar RMSE values) (Al-Yaari et al, 2019;Colliander et al, 2017a) as the results of this study. Thus, we contribute with a modeling framework supported by the direct correlation between topography https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2019-191 and satellite soil moisture (Mason et al, 2016) that brings positive implications to increase the accuracy of satellite soil moisture measurements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a better calibration and understanding the main limitations of satellite soil moisture measurements across multiple environmental conditions, there is an increasing number of studies reporting validation performances across multiple scales (spatial and temporal) of available soil moisture satellite datasets (An et al, 2016;Colliander et al, 2017b;Dorigo et al, 2011b;Minet et al, 2012;Mohanty et al, 2017;Yee et al, 2016). Several reports have shown similar prediction bias (e.g., similar RMSE values) (Al-Yaari et al, 2019;Colliander et al, 2017a) as the results of this study. Thus, we contribute with a modeling framework supported by the direct correlation between topography https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2019-191 and satellite soil moisture (Mason et al, 2016) that brings positive implications to increase the accuracy of satellite soil moisture measurements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The ESA-CCI soil moisture product is a synthesis from multiple soil moisture sources and it covers four decades (from the 1978 to 2018) of accurate soil moisture values at the global scale. The ESA-CCI soil moisture product contains uncertainty of measurements and it covers a longer period of time (from 1978 to 2018) compared with other satellite-derived soil moisture products (Al-Yaari et al, 2019), and is suitable for applications in long-term ecological and hydrological studies (Dorigo et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that the number of available ground-measurements is not sufficient to separate them between training and validation datasets, 10-fold cross-validation methods [40][41][42] were used to evaluate the upscaled SM by comparing them against the in situ measurements from the sixteen WSN sites. In addition, the upscaled SM estimates were also evaluated by comparing them against the SM data measured by two AMSs.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that SM retrieval algorithms are rapidly developing, and work on their improvement is still being carried out using new concepts or implementing new calibration parameters [20,29]. Therefore, some newly developed SM products have not been fully assessed and inter-compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%