2011 12th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1109/radecs.2011.6131399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and comparison of the low energy proton sensitivity in 65nm to 28nm SRAM devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This energy may further reduce as the proton travels through the BEOL, bringing the proton to enter the SV at an energy close to the Bragg peak (at around 50 keV) where the linear energy transfer (LET) is maximum. Therefore, given that many devices in the 28-90 nm sensitive node size have been shown in the literature [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] to be very sensitive to LEPs, it is possible that they will also be significantly sensitive to thermal neutrons if nitrogen is used in their manufacturing process. Concerning the 14 N target nucleus this turns into a 14 C product nucleus with an energy of just 42 keV, after the neutron capture and proton emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This energy may further reduce as the proton travels through the BEOL, bringing the proton to enter the SV at an energy close to the Bragg peak (at around 50 keV) where the linear energy transfer (LET) is maximum. Therefore, given that many devices in the 28-90 nm sensitive node size have been shown in the literature [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] to be very sensitive to LEPs, it is possible that they will also be significantly sensitive to thermal neutrons if nitrogen is used in their manufacturing process. Concerning the 14 N target nucleus this turns into a 14 C product nucleus with an energy of just 42 keV, after the neutron capture and proton emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D IRECT ionization from low-energy protons (LEP) and related upsets in highly integrated memory devices have been a subject of study for one and a half decades [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. When the critical charge is low enough (as it is the case for advanced node technologies, < 90 nm [5]), even LEPs can have sufficient linear energy transfer (LET) [0.1-0.5 MeV/(mg/cm 2 )] to cause a bit flip [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the past decade, several studies have shown that the contribution of the direct ionization from low energy protons has a potentially significant impact on the accuracy of prediction methods used to calculate the upset rate [2][3][4][5][6]. The issue became more acute with the miniaturization of electronics in deep sub-micron technologies [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%