The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-36-969-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing water vapor tomography in Hong Kong with improved vertical and horizontal constraints

Abstract: Abstract. In this study, we focused on the retrieval of atmospheric water vapor density by optimizing the tomography technique. First, we established a new atmospheric weighted average temperature model that considers the effects of temperature and height, assisted by Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC) products. Next, we proposed a new method to determine the scale height of water vapor, which will improve the quality of vertical constraints. Finally, we determined … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the vertical domain, the optimal top boundary of the two tomographic experiments is first determined according to the water vapor distribution derived from local radiosonde data in Hong Kong and Xuzhou, respectively (Zhang et al 2020b). Fifteen uneven vertical divisions are implemented for both areas (Xia et al 2018), with the interval of 0.4 km for each layer from the first to the tenth layer, and the interval of 1.0, 1.0, 1.5, 1.5, 2.0 km from the eleventh to 15th layer. Additionally, in the experiments, the average 3-day radiosonde data before the tomography time windows are used to initialize the tomography models (Zhao et al 2018).…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the vertical domain, the optimal top boundary of the two tomographic experiments is first determined according to the water vapor distribution derived from local radiosonde data in Hong Kong and Xuzhou, respectively (Zhang et al 2020b). Fifteen uneven vertical divisions are implemented for both areas (Xia et al 2018), with the interval of 0.4 km for each layer from the first to the tenth layer, and the interval of 1.0, 1.0, 1.5, 1.5, 2.0 km from the eleventh to 15th layer. Additionally, in the experiments, the average 3-day radiosonde data before the tomography time windows are used to initialize the tomography models (Zhao et al 2018).…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ω values obtained in different seasons (spring, summer, autumn, and winter) are shown in Figure 2. In addition, the distribution of ω across China was derived from these values based on the Gauss distance-weighting function [27,28], as shown in the four subgraphs in Figure 3. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate that the ω coefficients varied by more than ±2 in some areas, depending on the season.…”
Section: The Determination Of the Mixing Ratio Of The Atmosphere (ω)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introducing moderateresolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) [10], interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) [11], and ground-based meteorological observation [12] data into the tomographic model, also helps to solve the above problem. Introducing wet refractivity profiles that are derived from radio occultation data can also considerably improve tomographic solutions [13][14][15]. In addition to the effective methods mentioned above, increasing the number of observations is also effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%