2007
DOI: 10.2737/nrs-rb-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing urban forest effects and values, Philladelphia's urban forest

Abstract: An analysis of trees in Philadelphia reveals that this city has about 2.1 million trees with canopies that cover 15.7 percent of the area. The most common tree species are black cherry, crabapple, and tree of heaven. The urban forest currently stores about 530,000 tons of carbon valued at $9.8 million. In addition, these trees remove about 16,100 tons of carbon per year

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements of trees/shrubs were conducted according to the manual of UFORE (Nowak et al 2005). For herb plots, the average height of each species was measured as the average height of three individuals that appeared to be of median height.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements of trees/shrubs were conducted according to the manual of UFORE (Nowak et al 2005). For herb plots, the average height of each species was measured as the average height of three individuals that appeared to be of median height.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other cities in China, as well as in other countries have also implemented similar policies aiming to increase urban greenspace. For example, many cities in the USA have established their Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) goals for tree planting programs, such as the Million Trees Campaign in New York City, and the Million Trees LA in Los Angeles, as a part of their sustainability plans to achieve such benefits as microclimate regulation, stormwater management, and cultural ecosystem services (Nowak 2007;Huang et al 2011). Urban greenspace at the fine scale in these cities is dynamic, which warrants further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include regulation of climate and water cycles (Bolund and Hunhammar 1999;Zhou et al 2011), noise reduction (Pathak et al 2011), air pollution mitigation (Yang et al 2005;Nowak et al 2006), reduced energy use (Ng et al 2012), increased property values (Tajima 2003), and improved aesthetics (Home et al 2010). Presence of urban vegetation can also contribute to reductions in residents' stress and feelings of anger and anxiety (Thompson et al 2012), and generate stronger social cohesion and community empowerment (Wolf and Housley 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UFORE estimated that NYC's forest stores 1.35 million tons of carbon, a service valued at $24.9 million. The forest sequesters an additional 42,300 tons of carbon per year (valued at $779,000 per year) and about 2,202 tons of air pollution per year (valued at $10.6 million per year; Nowak et al 2007). …”
Section: The Ecological Value Of Urban Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%