Assessing Tumor Microenvironment Characteristics and Stratifying EPR with a Nanobubble Companion Nanoparticle via Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment is characterized by dysfunctional endothelial cells, resulting in heightened vascular permeability. Many nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems attempt to use this enhanced permeability combined with impaired lymphatic drainage (a concept known as the ‘enhanced permeability and retention effect’ or EPR effect) as the primary strategy for drug delivery, but this has not proven to be as clinically effective as anticipated. The specific mechanisms behind the inconsistent clinical outcomes of nanotherapeutics have not been clearly articulated, and the field has been hampered by a lack of accessible tools to study EPR-associated phenomena in clinically relevant scenarios. While medical imaging has tremendous potential to contribute to this area, it has not been broadly explored. This work examines, for the first time, the use of multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with a novel nanoscale contrast agent to examine tumor microenvironment characteristics noninvasively and in real-time. We demonstrate that CEUS imaging can: (1) evaluate tumor microenvironment features and (2) be used to help predict the distribution of doxorubicin-loaded liposomes in the tumor parenchyma. CEUS using nanobubbles (NBs) was carried out in two tumor types of high (LS174T) and low (U87) vascular permeability, and time-intensity curve (TIC) parameters were evaluated in both models prior to injection of doxorubicin liposomes. Consistently, LS174T tumors showed significantly different TIC parameters, including area under the rising curve (2.7x), time to peak intensity (1.9x) and decorrelation time (DT, 1.9x) compared to U87 tumors. Importantly, the DT parameter successfully predicted tumoral nanoparticle distribution (r = 0.86 ± 0.13). Ultimately, substantial differences in NB-CEUS generated parameters between LS174T and U87 tumors suggest that this method may be useful in determining tumor vascular permeability and could be used as a biomarker for identifying tumor characteristics and predicting sensitivity to nanoparticle-based therapies. These findings could ultimately be applied to predicting treatment efficacy and to evaluating EPR in other diseases with pathologically permeable vasculature.

Mechanisms and Barriers in Nanomedicine: Progress in the Field and Future Directions

“…Ultrasound techniques, including Doppler, B-mode imaging, elastography, super-resolution, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), hold promise for predicting nanoparticle distribution and therapeutic effectiveness in solid tumors. Ultrasound has the benefits of lower cost, safety, portability, high spatial and temporal resolution, and high sensitivity of detection of contrast agents, including nano- and microbubbles . However, regardless of the modality, the imaging via nanoprobes could overestimate or underestimate the accumulation of nanomedicines because the mechanism of extravasation and uptake efficiency of imaging nanoprobes could be different from actual nanomedicines.…”