Assessing Trends in Functional and Structural Characteristics: A Survey of Statistical Methods With an Example From Ophthalmology

Abstract

PurposeClinical decisions on treatment are usually based on short-term records of consecutive measurements of structure and function. Useful models for analyzing average trends and a description of statistical methods for classifying individual subjects on the basis of subject-specific trend progressions are presented.MethodsRandom effects trend models allow intercepts and slopes of the trend regression to vary across subjects around group-specific mean intercepts and mean slopes. Model results assess whether average intercepts and slopes and subject variability in intercepts and slopes are the same across groups. Fisher's discriminant functions are used for classification.ResultsMethods are presented and illustrated on structural visual data from a multiyear perimetry study. Average thickness of the ganglion cell layer from the optical coherence tomography macula scan and of the retinal nerve fiber layer from the optic disc scan for both glaucoma patients on optimal treatment and normal subjects are analyzed. The random effects trend model shows that average intercepts of glaucoma patients and normal subjects are quite different, but that average slopes are the same, and that the subject variability in both intercepts and slopes is larger for the glaucoma group. These findings explain why the subject-specific trend progression is not a good classifier; it is the level of the measurement (intercept or baseline value) that carries useful information in this particular cohort example.Translational RelevanceClinicians base decisions on short-term records of consecutive measurements and need simple statistical tools to analyze the information. This paper discusses useful methods for analyzing short time series data. Model results assess whether there exist significant trends and whether average trends are different across groups. The paper discusses whether clinical measures classify patients reliably into disease groups, given their variability. With ever more available data, classification plays a central role of personalized medicine.

Association of Optical Coherence Tomography With Longitudinal Neurodegeneration in Veterans With Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

“…The RNFL is not static; it contains axons and glial cells. Axon volume may be influenced by the characteristics of axoplasmic flow and status of the axon, 36 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 which, in turn, may cause dynamic changes in the thickness of this layer. Changes in glial cells, including Mueller cells in the inner retina, could also explain an increase in RFNL over time due to gliosis.…”

“…An alternative statistical mixed-effects model of change over time in outcome variables was also used to analyze all observations over time in a single model. 36 The model incorporates random variability for outcome-specific intercepts and slopes around the fixed-effects intercept and mean slopes of the respective treatment groups (control and mild TBI). An advantage of this model is that it accounts for the different number of measurements on each eye, whereas the previous analysis assumes equal precision on all slope estimates.…”

“…An alternative statistical mixed-effects model of change over time in outcome variables was also used to analyze all observations over time in a single model. 36 The model incorporates random variability for…”

Focus on Data: Statistical Design of Experiments and Sample Size Selection Using Power Analysis

“…Example: Ledolter and Kardon 9 studied the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness from an optic disc scan for both normal subjects and glaucoma patients on optimal treatment. As expected, the average RNFL thickness of normal subjects was considerably larger than that of glaucoma subjects.…”

Progressão estrutural e funcional da lesão glaucomatosa na mácula

“…por esse motivo, vêm sendo amplamente utilizados em pesquisa oftalmológica, particularmente, em estudos de progressão glaucomatosa (86)(87)(88) .…”