2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-704x.2004.mp129001003.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Vulnerabilities of U.S. Drinking Water Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the United States, the USEPA and state regulators have been assessing the vulnerabilities of public water systems in terms of their susceptibility to terrorist attacks (Danneels and Finley 2004). If certain outcomes are likely to make a system more vulnerable than another to a terrorist attack, decision trees could be constructed to try and identify/ predict systems that will be most at risk.…”
Section: Other Data Mining Opportunities Related To Small Drinking Wamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, the USEPA and state regulators have been assessing the vulnerabilities of public water systems in terms of their susceptibility to terrorist attacks (Danneels and Finley 2004). If certain outcomes are likely to make a system more vulnerable than another to a terrorist attack, decision trees could be constructed to try and identify/ predict systems that will be most at risk.…”
Section: Other Data Mining Opportunities Related To Small Drinking Wamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The qualitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) framework can be used as a tool to develop and interpret this type of wastewater monitoring system. Because the threat level drives the risk assessment analysis, a monitoring system should be coordinated with findings from modeling studies on the survival and dispersion of contaminants (Kim et al, 2007;Romero et al, 2008;Sinclair et al, 2008), the contaminant point of introduction (Danneels and Finley, 2004), the health risk (Haas et al, 1999), and the locations of early warning systems/ sensors in wastewater and water treatment systems (Murray et al, 2004).…”
Section: A Monitoring For Human Pathogens In Sewagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the distributed size of WDNs even for smaller settlements, and the practical difficulty of protecting the numerous potential contamination entry points, the policy discourse is concerned with the safety of such systems under various threats. These can stem from deliberate, negligent, or accidental actions [9][10][11], including terrorism [10,[12][13][14][15]. Of growing interest is the special case of cyber-physical threats in the form of cyber-physical attacks (e.g., [16][17][18][19][20][21]) where, for example, a deliberate contamination event (a physical attack) is combined with a cyber-attack on the water quality (WQ) monitoring system of the WDN, usually a sub-system of the main SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%