Assessing the Visual Quality of Rural and Urban-fringed Landscapes surrounding Livestock Farms

Kaplan, Adnan; Taşkın, Turğay; Önenç, Alper

doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.07.011

Cited by 43 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite these differences, when farm buildings are excluded, the order of preferences of the groups is similar to that found in other studies on agricultural landscapes (Arriaza et al, 2004;Cook and Cable, 1995;Kaltenborn and Bjerke, 2002;Kaplan et al, 2006;Strumse, 1996).…”

Section: The Perception Of the Landscape Typessupporting

confidence: 76%

“…In the urban areas, natural elements improve the landscape quality (Matsuoka and Kaplan, 2008). In rural areas, all of the elements that are perceived as natural (woodlands, hedgerows, and meadows) improve the landscape, whereas anthropogenic elements worsen the visual quality (Arriaza et al, 2004;Cook and Cable, 1995;Franco et al, 2003;Kaplan et al, 2006;Palmer, 2008;Rogge et al, 2007;Schroeder, 1988;Tempesta and Marangon, 2008;Tempesta and Thiene, 2007). These preferences tend to remain stable over time (Palmer, 2004).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The perception of agrarian historical landscapes: A study of the Veneto plain in Italy

Tempesta

2010

Landscape and Urban Planning

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Perception Of the Landscape Typessupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

The perception of agrarian historical landscapes: A study of the Veneto plain in Italy

Tempesta

2010

Landscape and Urban Planning

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Several similar studies on visual quality assessment have been carried out by some Turkish researchers in Turkey in the following studies for rural and urban-fringed landscapes (Kaplan et al 2006), urban landscapes (Müderrisoglu et al 2006), urban rocky habitats (Acar and Sakıcı 2008) and rural-urban landscapes (Bulut 2006;Bulut and Yilmaz 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method

Bulut

Yılmaz

2008

Environ Monit Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Besides being an indispensable life element, water is also in the first rows among the most important landscape elements that have the visual reserve value in both natural and cultural environments. In this study, the aim was to present suggestions about the use of waterscapes in landscape design and planning attempts by determining the water types bearing high visual reserve values among different types of waterscapes bearing high visual reserve values. The visual quality assessment method was used in this study. One hundred and twenty eight university students ranked the six waterscapes in a visual quality survey. The results showed that urban waterscape scenery [visual quality point (VQP) = 6.0391], was the most preferred category, whereas, river scenery (VQP = 3.5547) was the least preferred. The second preferred waterscape was waterfall (in rural landscape) scenery (VQP = 5.8594) and the third was standing water scenery (SWS; VQP = 5.3672). The relationships between landscape parameters and visual quality of landscape indicated that vividness and fascinaty parameters had a significant relation with preference. Some suggestions were made regarding the use of wa terscapes visual value in planning and designing of the landscape.

show abstract

“…By collecting and analyzing research [6][7][8][9] on the autonomous development of rural communities and rural aesthetics [10][11][12][13][14][15], this study intends to explore the benefits of autonomous development for space improvement in rural communities. Gladkova and Romero-Trillo [16] discovered that beauty was composed of evaluation, emotion, and perception.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Analytic Hierarchy Process to Examine the Success Factors of Autonomous Landscape Development in Rural Communities

Liang

Peng

2017

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The absence of comprehensive plans has resulted in disordered rural development and construction and a mix of new and old buildings in rural communities. Disorganized and blighted spaces have become rural landscape obstacles. After the Rural Rejuvenation Act was passed, rural construction has been guided with plans, and the government expects to enhance surroundings and expand policies through autonomous community development to create a good rural landscape. Through a literature review, this study aims to establish key success factors in autonomous landscape development of rural communities, covering 8 criteria and 28 sub-criteria. A questionnaire survey was conducted among national rural communities, experts, and scholars. The analytic hierarchy process reveals that manpower input has the highest importance, thereby indicating that the improvement of autonomous community development would double with the guidance of community cadres and the participation of artists and experts.

show abstract

Assessing the Visual Quality of Rural and Urban-fringed Landscapes surrounding Livestock Farms

Cited by 43 publications

References 30 publications

The perception of agrarian historical landscapes: A study of the Veneto plain in Italy

The perception of agrarian historical landscapes: A study of the Veneto plain in Italy

Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method

Using Analytic Hierarchy Process to Examine the Success Factors of Autonomous Landscape Development in Rural Communities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About