2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the value of serum and urinary interleukins for diagnosis of acute kidney injury in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Introduction Several studies have questioned the diagnostic utility of interleukins (IL) in detecting acute kidney injury (AKI) in pediatric population. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic value of ILs in pediatric AKI patients. Method Two independent researchers screened records acquired through searching in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, until the end of 2020. Articles evaluating serum and urinary leve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, this elevation was detected in 205 patients, and in line with the literature, the development of crush syndrome and the need for fasciotomy were found to be signi cantly higher in these patients. In a study investigating the prevalence of post-traumatic acute kidney injury (AKI) in children victims, the prevalence was found to be 24.6% (51). In our study, the elevation of BUN and Creatin was detected in 81 of the patients, and crush syndrome and the need for fasciotomy were signi cant in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…In our study, this elevation was detected in 205 patients, and in line with the literature, the development of crush syndrome and the need for fasciotomy were found to be signi cantly higher in these patients. In a study investigating the prevalence of post-traumatic acute kidney injury (AKI) in children victims, the prevalence was found to be 24.6% (51). In our study, the elevation of BUN and Creatin was detected in 81 of the patients, and crush syndrome and the need for fasciotomy were signi cant in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that seatbelt use is a protective factor against mortality and serious injury which is consistent with the lower MAIS and mortality observed in our study. 15,16 However, the observed higher number of injuries contradicts the literature. 15,16 A possible explanation for the increased number of injuries with seatbelt use is that seatbelts protect occupants from serious injuries by spreading kinetic forces over a greater body surface area, resulting in a greater number of injuries that are less severe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…15,16 However, the observed higher number of injuries contradicts the literature. 15,16 A possible explanation for the increased number of injuries with seatbelt use is that seatbelts protect occupants from serious injuries by spreading kinetic forces over a greater body surface area, resulting in a greater number of injuries that are less severe. 3…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In their review, Hasson et al [ 4 ] focus on those markers that are closest to clinical practice and that have already received regulatory approval in the U.S. or Europe. However, other unapproved biomarkers, such as proenkephalin or interleukins 6 (IL-6), IL-8 and IL-18, are also being evaluated for their ability to detect AKI, which is why meta-analyses like the one provided by Yousefifard et al [ 5 ] are essential to understand how well these are performing and if they hold any promise for clinical care. In the case of urinary IL-18 and serum IL-6 and IL-8, their meta-analysis shows that while levels of these markers are higher in AKI patients compared to the control group, their sensitivity and specificity is poor, which questions their diagnostic value [ 5 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other unapproved biomarkers, such as proenkephalin or interleukins 6 (IL-6), IL-8 and IL-18, are also being evaluated for their ability to detect AKI, which is why meta-analyses like the one provided by Yousefifard et al [ 5 ] are essential to understand how well these are performing and if they hold any promise for clinical care. In the case of urinary IL-18 and serum IL-6 and IL-8, their meta-analysis shows that while levels of these markers are higher in AKI patients compared to the control group, their sensitivity and specificity is poor, which questions their diagnostic value [ 5 ]. While Lima et al [ 6 ] demonstrated in a small subset of liver transplant patients (n = 57) that proenkephalin may hold promise for greater accuracy and earlier rise than creatinine in patients with severe AKI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%