2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aba80f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the validity and reliability and determining cut-points of the Actiwatch 2 in measuring physical activity

Abstract: This document is the author's post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no well-established cut-point exists for Actiwatch measurement of physical activity intensity in people with COPD, a cut-point of 256 cpm has been established for sedentary behavior in healthy adults. 44 In this study, the mean cpm value for all subjects was 246 ( SD = 87.6), indicating sedentary behavior. This result suggests that people with COPD and insomnia have low levels of physical activity, or exhibit sedentary behavior, regardless of their class membership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Although no well-established cut-point exists for Actiwatch measurement of physical activity intensity in people with COPD, a cut-point of 256 cpm has been established for sedentary behavior in healthy adults. 44 In this study, the mean cpm value for all subjects was 246 ( SD = 87.6), indicating sedentary behavior. This result suggests that people with COPD and insomnia have low levels of physical activity, or exhibit sedentary behavior, regardless of their class membership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The studies included in the analysis achieved scores on the Downs and Black checklist that ranged from 10 to 14, with an average score of 11.35. Two articles were assessed as high quality [32,45], whereas the remaining studies were categorized as medium quality [28][29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]46,47] (Additional File S2).…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study conducted a comprehensive analysis of 20 scholarly articles, encompassing a participant cohort of 1247 individuals. Among the studies included in this analysis, a total of 16 studies [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] diligently provided information on the average age of the participants. The mean age, calculated meticulously across the amalgamated studies, was determined to be 27.68 ± 17.99 years.…”
Section: General Characteristics Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other research has validated the ability of the actiwatch to differentiate PA intensity (e.g., Kemp et al, 2020;Lee & Tse, 2019;Neil-Sztramko et al, 2017). Because our data epoch length was 30 s, as opposed to 1 min, we scored the data using PA intensity cutoffs that were half of the counts-per-minute cutoffs used in Lee and Tse (2019).…”
Section: Exploratory Analysis Of Pa Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%