2023
DOI: 10.3390/w15152758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Sustainability of Photodegradation and Photocatalysis for Wastewater Reuse in an Agricultural Resilience Context

Tiziana Crovella,
Annarita Paiano

Abstract: The growths in worldwide population—of up to 8.5 billion people by 2030—and agriculture have put great pressure on water resources, above all in arid and drought-prone areas. Nowadays, water scarcity, drought and the pollution of wastewater are considered major issues of concern. For this reason, the authors provided an overview of two methods of wastewater water purification and removing pollutants for use in crop irrigation in a sustainable manner. The novelty lies in the reuse of recovered wastewater, purif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are some concerns associated with treated wastewater reuse in irrigation (e.g., health risks, soil salinity, and toxicity hazards) [42,44]. Proper treatment and use of wastewater, appropriate irrigation systems, efficient management, advanced technologies (e.g., nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, photodegradation, and photocatalysis), and effective governance and monitoring can alleviate these risks [39,40,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some concerns associated with treated wastewater reuse in irrigation (e.g., health risks, soil salinity, and toxicity hazards) [42,44]. Proper treatment and use of wastewater, appropriate irrigation systems, efficient management, advanced technologies (e.g., nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, photodegradation, and photocatalysis), and effective governance and monitoring can alleviate these risks [39,40,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%