2011
DOI: 10.3310/hta15010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology

Abstract: How to obtain copies of this and other HTA programme reports An electronic version of this title, in Adobe Acrobat format, is available for downloading free of charge for personal use from the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk). A fully searchable DVD is also available (see below).Printed copies of HTA journal series issues cost £20 each (post and packing free in the UK) to both public and private sector purchasers from our despatch agents.Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For Europ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies should seek to measure the impact of non-technical skills on operative performance. An assessment tool for these skills has recently been shown to be reliable and easy to use 34 . The simulated operating theatre, which recreates the complex team-based interactions of a real operating theatre 35 , might be the best place to evaluate these skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should seek to measure the impact of non-technical skills on operative performance. An assessment tool for these skills has recently been shown to be reliable and easy to use 34 . The simulated operating theatre, which recreates the complex team-based interactions of a real operating theatre 35 , might be the best place to evaluate these skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anonymised procedures were then assessed by two blinded expert raters (Consultant Otologists) using a nine-parameter rating scale (each scored 1-5, maximum score 45; Table S1). This rating scale was derived from the ISCP procedural checklist for myringotomy and grommet insertion (PBA & DOPS) 6 and modified using a global rating tool validated for intra-operative assessment in another ENT micro-surgical procedure. 7 Scores allocated were analysed for inter-rater reliability and combined to calculate an average score for each procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome measures were to determine the construct validity (the extent to which the assessment tests the professional constructs on which they are based, for example by differentiating experience levels of surgeons) 6 and the reliability of video assessment scoring of myringotomy and grommet Insertion by two raters at ENT Consultant level with a subspecialty interest in Otology. As a secondary outcome measure, the performance (by rating) of participants compared to operative time was assessed.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations