2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the suitability of Imaging-PAM fluorometry for monitoring growth of benthic diatoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interest in using F t instead of the well-known MPB biomass proxy F 0 (Consalvey et al, 2005) was to avoid darkening of the MPB, which is known to induce counteracting downward migration, and would have therefore disrupted rhythmic dynamics in MPB migration. Stock et al (2019) also noticed that F 0 could be successfully replaced by F t under some experimental conditions [see also Ni Longphuirt et al (2006)]. We verified that F t was well correlated to the Chl a content of sediment surface (R 2 = 0.84), a correlation as strong as the ones previously reported between F t (Ni Longphuirt et al, 2006) or F 0 (Honeywill et al, 2002;Serôdio et al, 2006) and Chl a.…”
Section: Monitoring Of the Changes In The Mpb Pab At The Surface Of Ssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The interest in using F t instead of the well-known MPB biomass proxy F 0 (Consalvey et al, 2005) was to avoid darkening of the MPB, which is known to induce counteracting downward migration, and would have therefore disrupted rhythmic dynamics in MPB migration. Stock et al (2019) also noticed that F 0 could be successfully replaced by F t under some experimental conditions [see also Ni Longphuirt et al (2006)]. We verified that F t was well correlated to the Chl a content of sediment surface (R 2 = 0.84), a correlation as strong as the ones previously reported between F t (Ni Longphuirt et al, 2006) or F 0 (Honeywill et al, 2002;Serôdio et al, 2006) and Chl a.…”
Section: Monitoring Of the Changes In The Mpb Pab At The Surface Of Ssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Daily biomass estimates were obtained using both pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) fluorometry (IMAGING-PAM M-Series Maxi version, Walz) and cell counts (Stock et al, 2019). Minimal fluorescence (F 0 ) was measured (intensity: 6, gain: 3, and frequency: 1) daily, for a period of 7 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular fluorescence parameters were monitored using Pulsed-Amplitude-Modulation based fluorometry (AquaPen-C 100; Photon Systems Instruments, Drasov, Czech Republic) after 15 min dark incubation of 2 mL cell suspensions. This method yields the cells' photosynthetic capacity (the quantum yield of Photosystem II) as F v /F m and the darkadapted minimal fluorescence parameter (F 0 ) as a reliable proxy for biomass during the exponential growth phase [49]. Maximum growth rates during batch cultivation were calculated by multiplication of the doubling time k with the natural logarithm of 2, where k was determined by regression of either F 0 values or cell density values during the exponential growth phase according to the equation k = log 2 (N t /N 0 )/∆t [50].…”
Section: Cellular Growth and Photophysiology Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%