2017
DOI: 10.1515/jwld-2017-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the suitability of extreme learning machines (ELM) for groundwater level prediction

Abstract: Fluctuation of groundwater levels around the world is an important theme in hydrological research. Rising water demand, faulty irrigation practices, mismanagement of soil and uncontrolled exploitation of aquifers are some of the reasons why groundwater levels are fluctuating. In order to effectively manage groundwater resources, it is important to have accurate readings and forecasts of groundwater levels. Due to the uncertain and complex nature of groundwater systems, the development of soft computing techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extreme learning machine model has shown better forecasting ability as compared to the support vector machine model for forecasting monthly groundwater levels at two observation wells located in Canada [YADAV et al 2017]. A hybrid least square support vector regression-gravitational search algorithm (HLGSA) was successfully used for predicting monthly river flows in Astor and Shyok catchments (Pakistan) [ADNAN et al 2017].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extreme learning machine model has shown better forecasting ability as compared to the support vector machine model for forecasting monthly groundwater levels at two observation wells located in Canada [YADAV et al 2017]. A hybrid least square support vector regression-gravitational search algorithm (HLGSA) was successfully used for predicting monthly river flows in Astor and Shyok catchments (Pakistan) [ADNAN et al 2017].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these approaches, machine learning is the most effective inversion technique since the other techniques have limited application areas as well as depend on area-specific surface parameters and experimental equations [13,14]. Machine learning methods include partial least squares regression, support vector machines, extreme learning machine, the cubist regression, Bayes and neural networks, are the mostly employed inversion techniques for SWC prediction [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al () analyzed the ability of ANNs to predict water table depth in a swamp forest in Singapore, establishing that accurate estimates could be obtained with a daily LT, whereas the performance decreased for the LT of a week. Yadav et al () compared the performance of extreme learning machines and support vector machines in forecasting monthly GW levels in two different wells in Canada, discovering that extreme learning machines outperformed support vector machines in both analyzed case studies. We carried out a study to compare the predicting capabilities of five different DDMs to forecast seasonal (1‐ to 4‐month) GW levels in different hydrological regimes (Amaranto et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%