2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8cp01337c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the scalability of low conductivity substrates for photo-electrodesviamodelling of resistive losses

Abstract: When scaling up photo-electrochemical processes to larger areas than conventionally studied in the laboratory, substrate performance must be taken into consideration and in this work, a methodology to assess this via an uncomplicated 2 dimensional model is outlined. It highlights that for F-doped SnO2 (FTO), which is ubiquitously used for metal oxide photoanodes, substrate performance becomes significant for moderately sized electrodes (5 cm) under no solar concentration for state of the art Fe2O3 thin films. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our calculations fall in line with what has been previously reported for the resistive losses caused by large area FTO substrates. 36 This problem has also been encountered in photovoltaic cells, where the sheet resistance of FTO used as a top contact layer is too high for efficient current collection. 37 This is typically resolved by depositing highly conductive metallic busbars on the front contact of the PV cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our calculations fall in line with what has been previously reported for the resistive losses caused by large area FTO substrates. 36 This problem has also been encountered in photovoltaic cells, where the sheet resistance of FTO used as a top contact layer is too high for efficient current collection. 37 This is typically resolved by depositing highly conductive metallic busbars on the front contact of the PV cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The signicant loss of efficiency has been attributed not to the scale-up of the light absorber material (i.e., BiVO 4 ) itself, but more to the ohmic losses and mass-transport (proton/hydroxyl ions) limitations. Several modeling studies have also investigated some of these aspects (substrate losses, ionic drop, mass transfer), [24][25][26][27][28] but the overall quantication of the various loss mechanisms related to scale-up has not been reported. This is important in order to propose and implement appropriate (photo)electrochemical engineering and design strategies in order to overcome the scale-up related losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[16][17][18][19] Although there are no abrupt changes and the transport losses increase continuously with increasing device size, different transport losses, perhaps coincidentally, signicantly affect device operation when the distances reach the centimetre scale, matching the limit of the laboratory-scale. 11,16,[19][20][21][22][23] Especially losses in electrolyte for large devices are underestimated by measurements of small samples. 16 In principle, large areas could be covered by replicating a small device numerous times, but there may be practical limitations to how large such a base unit should be at least.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%