2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Gravid Patients at Risk for Placenta Accreta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these situations MRI appears to be helpful because it can reveal signs not visible by ultrasound (dark intraplacental bands, for example) which can be used to confirm or refute the diagnosis of placenta accreta. On the other hand, if there is a strong suspicion of placenta accreta or percreta at Doppler ultrasound, with several signs present with good PPV, the result of the MRI exam should not alter the obstetric management [36]. Because of the possible burden for the patient in the case of placenta accreta, she should be referred to an appropriate institution for perpartum management and the placenta should be considered as accreta when organizing the course of delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these situations MRI appears to be helpful because it can reveal signs not visible by ultrasound (dark intraplacental bands, for example) which can be used to confirm or refute the diagnosis of placenta accreta. On the other hand, if there is a strong suspicion of placenta accreta or percreta at Doppler ultrasound, with several signs present with good PPV, the result of the MRI exam should not alter the obstetric management [36]. Because of the possible burden for the patient in the case of placenta accreta, she should be referred to an appropriate institution for perpartum management and the placenta should be considered as accreta when organizing the course of delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MRI has a high predictive accuracy in assessing both the depth and topography of placental invasion, there is no difference in either the sensitivity or the specificity between ultrasound and MRI for the detection of invasive placentation [12]. When used in conjunction with ultrasound, MRI rarely changes the surgical management of MAP [13]. Also, despite the high diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and MRI in the diagnosis of MAP, there remain some questions around the consistency and interobserver agreement of their interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever both modalities are used the most suspicious findings have to be used to decide on the management irrespective of the modality. 2,29 A meta-analysis of the performance of MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta involving 18 studies and 1010 pregnancies found it to be highly accurate in the diagnosis of invasive placentation. 30 MRI was found to have a high predictive accuracy in assessing the depth as well the topography of invasive placenta with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 84%.…”
Section: Mri Evaluation Of Placenta Accretamentioning
confidence: 99%