Assessing the Risk of Delirium and Death in Sepsis Using the Braden Score: A Retrospective Study

Abstract

Aims and ObjectivesTo provide a viable tool for the early clinical identification of high‐risk populations in patients with sepsis.BackgroundSepsis‐associated delirium (SAD) has the potential to significantly impact the short‐ and long‐term prognosis of patients. However, accurately predicting and effectively managing SAD remains a significant challenge.MethodsThis study employed a retrospective analysis of adult sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for the first time. Patients were divided into two groups based on their initial Braden score upon admission to the ICU: a high‐risk group (≤ 15 points) and a low‐risk group (> 15 points). The relationship between Braden score and delirium was assessed using logistic regression and restricted cubic splines, while restricted mean survival time was employed to analyse the relationship between Braden scores and patients' 90‐ and 180‐day mortality.ResultsOf the 28,312 patients included in the study, those in the high‐risk group exhibited a significantly elevated risk of delirium (44.8% vs. 29.7%) and higher 90‐day (28.7% vs. 19.4%) and 180‐day (33.2% vs. 24.1%) mortality rates (all p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, logistic regression demonstrated that the risk of delirium was 1.54 times higher in the high‐risk group (95% CI = 1.45–1.64, p < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, the difference in survival was statistically significant at both time points, with the high‐risk group having a reduced survival rate of 7.50 days (95% CI = −8.24, −6.75; p < 0.001) and 15.74 days (95% CI = −17.40, −14.08; p < 0.001) at 90 days and 180 days, respectively.ConclusionsThe Braden score is a simple and effective tool for the early identification of patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes in sepsis.DesignRetrospective study.Relevance to Clinical PracticeThe Braden score can be employed by clinical nurses for the purpose of early identification of poor prognostic risk in patients with sepsis.Reporting MethodThis study was conducted according to the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.Patient or Public ContributionPatients were involved in the sample of the study.