2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the risk of a clinically significant infection from a Microneedle Array Patch (MAP) product

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Varying the pulse energies of the laser also did not affect the outcomes significantly. This is in line with previous studies showing that while higher pulse energies influence the depth of the micropores, the total drug delivery does not necessarily increase. , Both laser ablation and MN have well-documented clinical safety profiles triggering no or minor local reactions such as itching or redness. The skin barrier function typically regenerates within a few hours , while pore closure occurs within 24–48 h. , Further, phase 3 clinical trials did not show any elevated infection risks following pore induction …”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Varying the pulse energies of the laser also did not affect the outcomes significantly. This is in line with previous studies showing that while higher pulse energies influence the depth of the micropores, the total drug delivery does not necessarily increase. , Both laser ablation and MN have well-documented clinical safety profiles triggering no or minor local reactions such as itching or redness. The skin barrier function typically regenerates within a few hours , while pore closure occurs within 24–48 h. , Further, phase 3 clinical trials did not show any elevated infection risks following pore induction …”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…63−67 The skin barrier function typically regenerates within a few hours 68,69 while pore closure occurs within 24−48 h. 70,71 Further, phase 3 clinical trials did not show any elevated infection risks following pore induction. 69 Surprisingly, no significant differences were observed between DOPE-LNPs (∼14% editing in KC monolayers) and LNP H (∼71% editing in KC monolayers) in actual skin tissue (Figure 5B,C). We hypothesize that this may be due to the differentiation stages KCs obtain in skin tissue which is associated with decreased LDL receptor expression 72 resulting in less LNP uptake, hence lower editing efficacy.…”
Section: Lnp Composition and Genetic Payload Determinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, long-term studies on the cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of insulin by the MNs route of delivery are lacking. When promoting the application of MNs, the sterility and bacterial endotoxin should be carefully checked to avoid clinical infection [ 90 ]. Moreover, the frequency of MNs administration should be evaluated carefully for diabetic patients, given the small volume of the moulds and the small amount of insulin loading [ 91 ].…”
Section: Application Of Long-acting Polymeric Microneedlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of guidelines places a burden on applicants, such as establishing evaluation methods and confirming validity, which is unnecessary for other dosage forms, thereby hindering product development. Recently, a Regulatory Working Group (RWG) was established to collaborate with industry, government, and academia to identify critical quality attributes (CQAs) and standardize test methods for MNs [ 15 , 16 ]. The RWG proposed that the delivered dose, puncture performance, dissolution, physical stability, mechanical strength, and needle morphology were high-priority CQAs [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%