2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Retail Food Environment in Madrid: An Evaluation of Administrative Data against Ground Truthing

Abstract: Previous studies have suggested that European settings face unique food environment issues; however, retail food environments (RFE) outside Anglo-Saxon contexts remain understudied. We assessed the completeness and accuracy of an administrative dataset against ground truthing, using the example of Madrid (Spain). Further, we tested whether its completeness differed by its area-level socioeconomic status (SES) and population density. First, we collected data on the RFE through the ground truthing of 42 census t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study sample included 21 census tracts scattered around the city and encompassed a socioeconomically diverse sample. While details on this sampling strategy have been published elsewhere [ 25 ], Table S1 shows the descriptive statistics for these audit areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study sample included 21 census tracts scattered around the city and encompassed a socioeconomically diverse sample. While details on this sampling strategy have been published elsewhere [ 25 ], Table S1 shows the descriptive statistics for these audit areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived neighborhood quality [ 4 , 5 ] with increased neighborhood green spaces [ 6 , 7 ], decreased neighborhood disorder [ 8 ], and neighborhood socioeconomic advantage [ 9 , 10 ] have all been associated with normal allostatic load. Researchers often study allostatic load in the neighborhood context by utilizing administrative boundaries within publicly accessible databases as proxies for neighborhoods, which may not reflect the actual realities of the people who live in those neighborhoods [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have applied more than one matching approach in the comparison of different sources of secondary food outlet data and ground-truthed data. As in this study, Díez et al [ 24 ] applied location/name matching but also location matching alone to examine administrative food retailer data from Madrid, Spain. The first matching procedure resulted in substantially lower agreement statistics then the latter, with a sensitivity of 0.55 (CI:0.44–0.64) and a PPV of 0.45 (CI:0.37–0.54) compared to a sensitivity of 0.95 (CI:0.89–0.98) and a PPV of 0.79 (CI:0.70–0.85).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%