2021
DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000001892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Rebound Tonometry

Abstract: Precis: In a trio of prospective studies, the iCare rebound tonometer demonstrated significantly lower test-retest variability than Goldmann tonometry with good interoperator and interdevice reproducibility, supporting its value in monitoring intraocular pressure (IOP) changes over time. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize intraoperator and interoperator and interdevice reliability of IOP measurements with rebound tonometry (RT, ic100… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did find a difference in the agreement in IOP measurements between glaucoma patients and a glaucoma nurse clinician both using iCare HOME versus the agreement of glaucoma patients using iCare HOME compared with GAT. The former showed better agreement which is in keeping with Realini et al’s14 report of better intraoperator reproducibility of ICare model ic100 measurements compared with Goldmann measurements. They attribute this to Goldmann tonometry having many sources of error that vary over time making it unpredictable as opposed to the iCare rebound tonometer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We did find a difference in the agreement in IOP measurements between glaucoma patients and a glaucoma nurse clinician both using iCare HOME versus the agreement of glaucoma patients using iCare HOME compared with GAT. The former showed better agreement which is in keeping with Realini et al’s14 report of better intraoperator reproducibility of ICare model ic100 measurements compared with Goldmann measurements. They attribute this to Goldmann tonometry having many sources of error that vary over time making it unpredictable as opposed to the iCare rebound tonometer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The VA values were converted to a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). IOP was measured using an iCare tonometer (ic100, Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland) [ 19 ]. The median values of three consecutive measurements were considered [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VA values were converted to logMAR for analysis purposes. IOP was measured by an iCare tonometer (ic100, Icare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland) [ 8 ]. The median of three consecutive measurements was taken into consideration [ 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%