2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the relationship among urban trees, nitrogen dioxide, and respiratory health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
62
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the CIDS and a highly-resolved NO 2 surface [37] (Figure 2), we estimated that ~330,500 people (18% of the Portland Metro population) are exposed to the worst quintile of NO 2 pollution (13–24 ppb). Census Geography rasters were measured in the same manner by overlaying the area of interest over a rasterized choropleth of population density for both CBG and Census Tracts and calculating population values for only those specific pixels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the CIDS and a highly-resolved NO 2 surface [37] (Figure 2), we estimated that ~330,500 people (18% of the Portland Metro population) are exposed to the worst quintile of NO 2 pollution (13–24 ppb). Census Geography rasters were measured in the same manner by overlaying the area of interest over a rasterized choropleth of population density for both CBG and Census Tracts and calculating population values for only those specific pixels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the NO 2 model developed by Rao et al (2014) [37] (Equation (3)) for the Portland Metro area to assess air quality. Rao et al were able to explain 80% of the variation in NO 2 using a model that employed variables such as annual average daily traffic (AADT) and tree cover.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference in air quality might be partially related to fossil fuel burning, additional pollution sources located in the urban area, and the "filtering" effects of the forest area. NO 2 is considered to be a strong marker for anthropogenic air pollution, as biogenic volatile organic compounds emitted by trees react with urban NO x emissions to produce aerosols (a component of PM2.5) and ozone (Rao, George, Rosenstiel, Shandas, & Dinno, 2014). In this study, there were on average 9.4 kg less SO 2 (0.5 g per ha) and 40.9 kg (2.21 g per ha) less NO 2 in the forest than in the urban area each day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees are also planted to assist with superfund site cleanup (Pulford and Watson, 2003;Van Aken, 2008). A recent article (Rao et al, 2014) finds that tree cover in Portland, Oregon contributes to a reduction of NO x . Our results contribute to the understanding of the mechanism associated with NO x removal -namely, it is possible that biogenic VOCs react with NO x to effectively remove it from the air, but in the process may produce additional PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Relation To Afforestationmentioning
confidence: 98%