Assessing the readability and patient comprehension of rheumatology medicine information sheets: a cross-sectional Health Literacy Study

Abstract

ObjectivesPatients are often provided with medicine information sheets (MIS). However, up to 60% of patients have low health literacy. The recommended readability level for health-related information is ≤grade 8. We sought to assess the readability of MIS given to patients by rheumatologists in Australia, the UK and Canada and to examine Australian patient comprehension of these documents.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingCommunity-based regional rheumatology practice.ParticipantsRandom sample of patients attending the rheumatology practice.Outcome measuresReadability of MIS was assessed using readability formulae (Flesch Reading Ease formula, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook scale, FORCAST (named after the authors FORd, CAylor, STicht) and the Gunning Fog scale). Literal comprehension was assessed by asking patients to read various Australian MIS and immediately answer five simple multiple choice questions about the MIS.ResultsThe mean (±SD) grade level for the MIS from Australia, the UK and Canada was 11.6±0.1, 11.8±0.1 and 9.7±0.1 respectively. The Flesch Reading Ease score for the Australian (50.8±0.6) and UK (48.5±1.5) MIS classified the documents as ‘fairly difficult’ to ‘difficult’. The Canadian MIS (66.1±1.0) were classified as ‘standard’. The five questions assessing comprehension were correctly answered by 9/21 patients for the adalimumab MIS, 7/11 for the methotrexate MIS, 6/28 for the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory MIS, 10/11 for the prednisone MIS and 13/24 for the abatacept MIS.ConclusionsThe readability of MIS used by rheumatologists in Australia, the UK and Canada exceeds grade 8 level. This may explain why patient literal comprehension of these documents may be poor. Simpler, shorter MIS with pictures and infographics may improve patient comprehension. This may lead to improved medication adherence and better health outcomes.

Functional health literacy and caregiving burden among family caregivers of patients with end‐stage renal disease

“…In addition, those with limited FHL accessed health information from fewer resources and were more likely to use television but not printed media or health organization documents as their main source of health information (Yoshida, Iwasa, Kumagai, Suzuki, & Yoshida, 2014). Oliffe et al (2019) found that in comparison to patients with adequate FHL their counterparts with limited FHL were less likely to give correct answers to questions indicating an understanding of medication labels and were more likely to make errors while demonstrating medication administration. Limited FHL was also a strong indicator of poor processing of oral communication.…”

Quality, Trustworthiness, Readability, and Accuracy of Medical Information Regarding Common Pediatric Emergency Medicine-Related Complaints on the Web

“…Using previously described methodology, multiple readability formulae were used to improve the reliability of measures, with scores averaged to form a composite readability score for individual websites (18,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). A cutoff of an 8th-grade or lower reading level (#8.9 grade level) was chosen to define readability.…”

Preparing Infographics for Post-publication Promotion of Research on Social Media

“… 22 Another distinctive advantage is the ability of these to communicate important information across people of varied subject matter related to literacy, making them particularly useful for public health advisories. 23 24 25 26 They are also being used to improve research literacy among trial participants. 27 …”