2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:qure.0000031338.88928.e9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Quality of Life of Adults with Chronic Respiratory Diseases in Routine Primary Care: Construction and First Validation of the 10-Item Respiratory Illness Questionnaire-Monitoring 10 (RIQ-MON10)

Abstract: The short form (RIQ-MON10) maintained the psychometric properties of the original instrument and is promising for assessing quality of life (QoL) during routine primary care visits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total score is also calculated. It is self-administered and a shorter version has been described [122].…”
Section: Types Of Health Status and Hrqol Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total score is also calculated. It is self-administered and a shorter version has been described [122].…”
Section: Types Of Health Status and Hrqol Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of short instruments to measure health status has significantly improved their usage in daily clinical practice. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] However, the currently available health status questionnaires have a number of differences in the concepts included, and various items are unique in some questionnaires. 25,26 The theoretical model of factors that potentially have an influence on health status includes factors such as age, gender, disease severity, lung function, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, symptoms, exercise capacity, co-morbidity, depression, anxiety, and exacerbations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item within a domain was scored from 0 to 6 based on response selections ranging from extremely (or extensive) to not at all (or none). Higher scores within each domain 4,11,18). *Spearman correlation coefficient of each item to its domain score.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%