2011
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2011.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Probability of Drug-Induced QTc-Interval Prolongation During Clinical Drug Development

Abstract: Early in the course of clinical development of new non-antiarrhythmic drugs, it is important to assess the propensity of these drugs to prolong the QT/QTc-interval. The current regulatory guidelines suggest using the largest time-matched mean difference between drug and placebo (baseline-adjusted) groups over the sampling interval, thereby neglecting any potential exposure-effect relationship and nonlinearity in the underlying physiological fluctuation in QT values. Thus far, most of the attempted models for c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, there is still no clear consensus on when Bayesian methods should be chosen over frequentist approaches [37]. Unlike the probability curve reported in [24,30], where only the posterior distribution of the typical value of the drug effect parameter was considered (which provides the probability curve of QT-interval prolongation greater than a certain threshold for the typical subject), herein a more thorough approach was introduced where the posterior distributions of both the typical parameter and the interindividual variability were accounted for. Therefore, both the uncertainty of the parameter estimates and the interindividual variability are used to calculate the probability curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, there is still no clear consensus on when Bayesian methods should be chosen over frequentist approaches [37]. Unlike the probability curve reported in [24,30], where only the posterior distribution of the typical value of the drug effect parameter was considered (which provides the probability curve of QT-interval prolongation greater than a certain threshold for the typical subject), herein a more thorough approach was introduced where the posterior distributions of both the typical parameter and the interindividual variability were accounted for. Therefore, both the uncertainty of the parameter estimates and the interindividual variability are used to calculate the probability curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, due to the known prolonging effect on the QT interval, moxifloxacin has already been the subject of translational investigations to assess the potential relationship between dogs and humans [24,28,29]. In view of this, the development of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to investigate the drug-induced QT-interval prolongation in dogs and humans as well as the assessment of the probability of QT-interval prolongation greater than a specified threshold could be suitable to evaluate the propensity of compounds to prolong the QT interval, as already reported in [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important determinant for development of TdP is the prolongation of the QT interval, mostly arising from the prolongation of the action potential (AP) which affects the rapid potassium current (I kr ) by inhibition of Ether-a-go-go-Releted Gene (hERG) channel in CMs [1,4]. Currently, assessing the risk of drug-induced QT interval prolongation is one of the main aspects of the standard preclinical drug evaluation [5,6]. The assessments should be preferably based on repeated-dose toxicity tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for PKPD model development are detailed in Bergenholm et al (2016). Baseline variability of JT intervals was minimized applying a circadian rhythm and RR correction models (Chain et al, 2011; Bergenholm et al, 2016). The PK and PD were modeled sequentially, and Model 10 (Table 1) was selected to describe the drug effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%