2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the preparedness of university libraries for digital preservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, digital preservation is unique in the sense that it is a multifaceted and multidimensional task (Ahmad and Rafiq, 2022a). Instead, it is an ongoing process.…”
Section: Information and Communication Technologies Have Been Instrum...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, digital preservation is unique in the sense that it is a multifaceted and multidimensional task (Ahmad and Rafiq, 2022a). Instead, it is an ongoing process.…”
Section: Information and Communication Technologies Have Been Instrum...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology is advancing at a rapid pace (Ahmad and Rafiq, 2022a) and these advancements sometimes lead to technological obsolescence, and resultantly may make the existing digital information inaccessible. To avoid this issue, migrating to new technology (software and hardware) is a vital option (Gbaje, 2011;Okoh and Sambo, 2014;Ruusalepp, 2003;Wilson, 2007).…”
Section: Digital Preservation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There exist well‐established concerns around the dire need for proactive digital preservation and curation within cultural heritage institutions (Hedstrom, 1997). Sociotechnical concerns regarding digital preservation and curation include several issues: identifying institutional preparedness for digital preservation workflows (Ahmad & Rafig, 2022); planning for long‐term preservation of web‐based content (Day, 2006); scaling institutional resources to assure digital sustainability (Montoya, 2016); and assuring that materials include enough context to explore diverse and understudied histories (Sheffield, 2016). In spite of the variety of generative outcomes associated with planning for and implementing thorough methods for digital preservation and curation, institutional and stakeholder support remain limited if present at all (Council on Library and information Resources, 2013; Poole, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%