2020
DOI: 10.3171/2020.2.peds19709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the predictive value of primary evaluation with the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test following head injury

Abstract: OBJECTIVEConcussions are a major public health concern, especially for high school and college student athletes. However, there are few prognostic metrics that can accurately quantify concussion severity in order to anticipate recovery time and symptom regression. The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT) is a widely used neurocognitive assessment that can diagnose and track recovery from concussions. This study assesses whether initial ImPA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ImPACT PCSS survey was used to calculate the symptom score composite, and the ImPACT neurocognitive tests were used to calculate verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor skills, and reaction time composites. 6 , 11 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ImPACT PCSS survey was used to calculate the symptom score composite, and the ImPACT neurocognitive tests were used to calculate verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor skills, and reaction time composites. 6 , 11 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the SI may permit a more complete assessment of severity than previously possible because the SI can better delineate severity from recovery time while also predicting recovery. 22 This is the first study to use SI to quantify neurocognitive concussion severity in a prospective fashion, although multiple previous concussion studies have made severity estimations using only Symptom scores or using recovery length as a retrospective indicator. 4,23,27,45,50 These differences in method make comparisons between these previous studies and ours more suited to discussions of symptom clusters and recovery findings rather than severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of all significant composite score differences standardized by their respective S diff is the SI. 22…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations