The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01159-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing The Predictive Value of Clinical Complete Response To Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of 488 Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
176
2
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
176
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuing evaluation of MRI, positron emission tomography and endoscopic ultrasound after neoadjuvant treatment as a guide to surgical management may allow more conservative approach for responding patients. However as noted in our study and other studies (Hiotis et al, 2002), many patients with clinical CR had persistent foci of tumours that were not detectable on preoperative imaging, therefore treatment decisions should not be based solely on the absence of clinically palpable or visible tumour after chemoradiation. Indeed, one patient with clinical CR in our study was found to have residual tumour and CRM involvement following resection highlighting the risk of no excision after obtaining a clinical CR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Continuing evaluation of MRI, positron emission tomography and endoscopic ultrasound after neoadjuvant treatment as a guide to surgical management may allow more conservative approach for responding patients. However as noted in our study and other studies (Hiotis et al, 2002), many patients with clinical CR had persistent foci of tumours that were not detectable on preoperative imaging, therefore treatment decisions should not be based solely on the absence of clinically palpable or visible tumour after chemoradiation. Indeed, one patient with clinical CR in our study was found to have residual tumour and CRM involvement following resection highlighting the risk of no excision after obtaining a clinical CR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…However, the question remains of how important this is, as there are only two circumstances is which the presence of lymph node metastases is relevant in clinical decision making: first, the choice of local excision in the absence of lymphadenopathy and second the present of lymph node metastases outside the end pelvic envelope makes the primary tumor locally advanced [31][32][33]. In this first situation the histological characteristics of the primary tumor are now relevant than lymph node imaging [34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hiotis [16] reported that a cCR had a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 16% for pCR. when comparing preoperative clinical exam with surgical specimen.…”
Section: Complete Clinical Responsementioning
confidence: 99%