2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-021-01837-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Predictability of Solar Energetic Particles with the Use of Machine Learning Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, independently, different authors (i.e., Lavasa et al. (2021), and the authors of the current manuscript) have shown the usage and extent of ML methods to the imbalanced problem of SPE forecasting with results in very good agreement and pointing to the same direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, independently, different authors (i.e., Lavasa et al. (2021), and the authors of the current manuscript) have shown the usage and extent of ML methods to the imbalanced problem of SPE forecasting with results in very good agreement and pointing to the same direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We point out that this is a critical issue of any statistical approach, and thus the model validation must be done by preserving the class distributions within the training and test datasets. Very recently, Lavasa et al (2021), also treated the inherently imbalanced problem of SPE binary prediction. Thus, independently, different authors (i.e., Lavasa et al (2021), and the authors of the current manuscript) have shown the usage and extent of ML methods to the imbalanced problem of SPE forecasting with results in very good agreement and pointing to the same direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Predictions of SEPs have also been explored with a number of physics-based (e.g., Marsh et al, 2015;Schwadron et al, 2010;Zhang and Zhao, 2017), empirical (e.g., Anastasiadis et al, 2017;Bruno and Richardson, 2021;Posner , 2007;Richardson et al, 2018), and machine learning (e.g., Kasapis et al, 2022;Lavasa et al, 2021;Stumpo et al, 2021) models, some of which can additionally be coupled with coronal and/or heliospheric MHD simulations to investigate time-dependent particle acceleration (e.g., Wijsen et al, 2021;Young et al, 2021). International efforts (see, e.g., the SEP Validation Team: https://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/assessment/topics/helio-sep.php) are underway to assess the current status of SEP forecasting and to establish community-wide metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%