2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-7535(01)00082-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the practical benefits of formal methods for software development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of the most common methodologies are the ESA standard [28] and the Agile methodology [29]. Droschl et al (2002) compared the development of a software module using the ESA standard with the formal Vienna development method (VDM) and found that the use of VDM led to the fulfillment of more requirements, thus increasing the quality of the developed product [30]. Many other methods for the design, development and validation of a software module or a software solution can be found in the bibliography (e.g.…”
Section: Methodologies Used For the Development And Analysis Of Ict Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the most common methodologies are the ESA standard [28] and the Agile methodology [29]. Droschl et al (2002) compared the development of a software module using the ESA standard with the formal Vienna development method (VDM) and found that the use of VDM led to the fulfillment of more requirements, thus increasing the quality of the developed product [30]. Many other methods for the design, development and validation of a software module or a software solution can be found in the bibliography (e.g.…”
Section: Methodologies Used For the Development And Analysis Of Ict Smentioning
confidence: 99%