2022
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2022.3162911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Potential of Fully Polarimetric Mono- and Bistatic SAR Acquisitions in L-Band for Crop and Soil Monitoring

Abstract: Theoretical studies have shown that the use of simultaneous mono-and bistatic synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data could be beneficial to agriculture and soil moisture monitoring. This study makes use of extensive ground-truth measurements and synchronous high-resolution fully polarimetric mono-and bistatic airborne SAR data in L-band to assess and compare the sensitivity of mono-and multistatic systems to the maize canopy row structure and biophysical variables, as well as to soil moisture, and surface roughne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear and linear-log regression lines, depicted in Figure 6, suggest through their coefficients of determinations, r 2 lin and r 2 lin-log , that the L-band backscattering coefficients σ 0 from BELSAR are moderately sensitive to the GAI, especially in HV, with r 2 lin = 0.61 and r 2 lin-log = 0.73, and in VV, with r 2 lin = 0.63 and r 2 lin-log = 0.70, but have no sensitivity to the surface soil moisture under the canopy, with r 2 lin = 0.01 and r 2 lin-log = 0.01 in HV, and r 2 lin = 0.02 and r 2 lin-log = 0.01 in VV. This finding is discussed in more detail by Bouchat et al [50] in their study on the potential of the BELSAR airborne SAR acquisitions for agricultural applications, where the GAI is reported as the crop biophysical variable that is the most linearly correlated with the L-band backscattering coefficients used in this work, amongst all the crop variables measured in situ during the BELSAR campaign, i.e., GAI, plant height, wet and dry biomass, and vegetation water content which are reported in Table 2.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of L-band σ 0 To Gai and V Mmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The linear and linear-log regression lines, depicted in Figure 6, suggest through their coefficients of determinations, r 2 lin and r 2 lin-log , that the L-band backscattering coefficients σ 0 from BELSAR are moderately sensitive to the GAI, especially in HV, with r 2 lin = 0.61 and r 2 lin-log = 0.73, and in VV, with r 2 lin = 0.63 and r 2 lin-log = 0.70, but have no sensitivity to the surface soil moisture under the canopy, with r 2 lin = 0.01 and r 2 lin-log = 0.01 in HV, and r 2 lin = 0.02 and r 2 lin-log = 0.01 in VV. This finding is discussed in more detail by Bouchat et al [50] in their study on the potential of the BELSAR airborne SAR acquisitions for agricultural applications, where the GAI is reported as the crop biophysical variable that is the most linearly correlated with the L-band backscattering coefficients used in this work, amongst all the crop variables measured in situ during the BELSAR campaign, i.e., GAI, plant height, wet and dry biomass, and vegetation water content which are reported in Table 2.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of L-band σ 0 To Gai and V Mmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…These observations were described using the BBCH-scale [53]. A number of other maize biophysical variables were also collected during the BELSAR campaign [50]. They are partly reported in Table 2.…”
Section: In-situ Measurements Of Vegetation and Soil Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bouchat et al . 11 have used the dataset to assess the potential of simultaneous mono- and bistatic SAR acquisitions for agriculture and soil moisture monitoring applications, as well as the impact of maize row structure on the SAR backscatter. Tronquo et al .…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crops will experience significant changes to their shape at important phenological periods. However, many farmlands are obscured by clouds, making it more likely that the optical sensor will fail to capture images during the crucial phenological period for crops [14,15]. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is an active microwave sensor, which cannot be affected by cloudy and foggy weather [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%