2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0100638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the performance of ΔSCF and the diagonal second-order self-energy approximation for calculating vertical core excitation energies

Abstract: Vertical core excitation energies are obtained using a combination of the ΔSCF method and the diagonal second-order (D2) self-energy approximation. These methods are applied to a set of neutral molecules and their anionic forms. An assessment of the results with the inclusion of relativistic effects is presented. For core excitations involving delocalized symmetry orbitals, the applied composite method improves upon the overestimation of ΔSCF by providing approximate values close to experimental K-shell transi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 91 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, these methods do not include spin coupling, so there is no distinction between singlet and triplet excitations starting from a singlet ground state. The singlet–triplet excitation gap for c → υ excitation could be estimated as , E singlet E triplet 2 [ false( c υ false| c υ false) false( c c false| υ υ false) ] If one is willing to introduce two-electron integrals, then one may also correct the ΔSCF result via perturbation theory. However, direct use of electron repulsion integrals is a step away from the purpose of using eigenvalue-based methods in the first place. As such, we will not attempt to compute any spin couplings in the present work.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, these methods do not include spin coupling, so there is no distinction between singlet and triplet excitations starting from a singlet ground state. The singlet–triplet excitation gap for c → υ excitation could be estimated as , E singlet E triplet 2 [ false( c υ false| c υ false) false( c c false| υ υ false) ] If one is willing to introduce two-electron integrals, then one may also correct the ΔSCF result via perturbation theory. However, direct use of electron repulsion integrals is a step away from the purpose of using eigenvalue-based methods in the first place. As such, we will not attempt to compute any spin couplings in the present work.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%