2009
DOI: 10.1080/19409041003611143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Performance of Systems Designed to Process Criminal Forensic Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) King & Maguire (2009) propose to follow the productive process from the crime scene to the court (Chart 2), including the chain of custody, which is the traceability of evidence. Burrows & Tarling (2004) measured the contribution of the English Forensic service in the identification and detention of perpetrators of crimes against property, mainly house robberies and theft of vehicles.…”
Section: Measuring Performance In Forensicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1) King & Maguire (2009) propose to follow the productive process from the crime scene to the court (Chart 2), including the chain of custody, which is the traceability of evidence. Burrows & Tarling (2004) measured the contribution of the English Forensic service in the identification and detention of perpetrators of crimes against property, mainly house robberies and theft of vehicles.…”
Section: Measuring Performance In Forensicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the relevance of the service, one of the gaps of Forensic Science operations is the measurement of performance (Figueiredo & Pareschi, 2012;King & Maguire, 2009). From this observation, it is set as a research problem: how to measure and evaluate the performance of Forensic Science operations based on the value that the service must deliver?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In what circumstances do police rely more strongly on forensic evidence (e.g., if suspect is uncooperative)? Many more questions like these must be posed (and answered) in order to help determine an accurate representation of the utility of forensic science (King and Maguire 2009). The majority of the work published has not considered how forensic science is actually used in the investigative process as a whole (Innes and Clarke 2009).…”
Section: Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…14;King & Maguire, 2009). For example, a recent study of NIBIN (King et al, 2013) revealed that in 65 criminal cases where a NIBIN hit was identified, the hit report was not helpful to investigators.…”
Section: Example 2: Processing Ballistic Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%