2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2016.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the performance of a cost-effective video lander for estimating relative abundance and diversity of nearshore fish assemblages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Watson et al. ), although this is not universal (Watson and Huntington ). Bait may attract individuals closer to the camera than they would otherwise get, allowing for accurate identification and counting even when lower‐resolution video is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Watson et al. ), although this is not universal (Watson and Huntington ). Bait may attract individuals closer to the camera than they would otherwise get, allowing for accurate identification and counting even when lower‐resolution video is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a baited survey may partly negate the benefits of using a higher-resolution camera. Many reef-fish taxa, including predatory and scavenging species, have been observed in greater numbers at baited stations than at unbaited stations Harvey et al 2007;Watson et al 2010), although this is not universal (Watson and Huntington 2016). Bait may attract individuals closer to the camera than they would otherwise get, allowing for accurate identification and counting even when lower-resolution video is used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the "STAVIRO" (rotating video system), described by Pelletier et al [26], for use on hard-and soft-substrate habitats successfully sampled 70% of the stations during a pilot study and reached 81% validation in a subsequent studies. More recently, the "compact video lander" developed by Watson and Huntington [45] was used on rocky reefs, and successfully sampled 70% of the stations. When deploying video systems directly from a boat, one of the main causes of nonvalidation is an inappropriate orientation of the camera towards the seabed.…”
Section: Fieldwork Implementation and Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical technologies are utilized worldwide to survey marine organisms, providing versatile, non-destructive tools to monitor both benthic and pelagic species 27 – 29 . In particular, baited remote underwater video (BRUV) surveys have become increasingly popular as cost-effective and relatively simple survey methods, with high accessibility to users as many BRUVs can be readily assembled with inexpensive components 30 , 31 . BRUVs have produced results comparable to some traditional fishing gear based survey methods, including longline surveys sampling relative shark abundances 32 , 33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%