2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the oppressive impact of the form of tall buildings on citizens: Height, width, and height-to-width ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The low-rise building setting was rated as being more open and that (in our sample with video) participants were more satisfied with the openness, which aligns with previous research (Asgarzadeh, Luska, Kogab and Hirate, 2012;Asgarzadeh et al 2014;Zarghami et al 2019). In their work on environmental preferences, Kaplan, Kaplan & Brown (1989) identify four domains of predictors for scene preference: land form (i.e slope of land), land cover (i.e forestation), informational variable (i.e complexity), and perception-based variables (i.e openness).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The low-rise building setting was rated as being more open and that (in our sample with video) participants were more satisfied with the openness, which aligns with previous research (Asgarzadeh, Luska, Kogab and Hirate, 2012;Asgarzadeh et al 2014;Zarghami et al 2019). In their work on environmental preferences, Kaplan, Kaplan & Brown (1989) identify four domains of predictors for scene preference: land form (i.e slope of land), land cover (i.e forestation), informational variable (i.e complexity), and perception-based variables (i.e openness).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…One surprising finding of this study is that neither the real world or the 360-degree video study yielded significant effects of building height on oppressiveness. Previous studies which found effects of building height on ratings oppressiveness recruited architectural students as participants; there is a possibility that architectural students are more familiar with the concept of oppressiveness, which may be more of an abstract construct for psychology students to grasp; some study participants in previous studies were unsure about the meaning of the word (Asgarzadeh, Luska, Kogab and Hirate, 2012;Asgarzadeh et al 2014;Zarghami et al 2019). We did, however, observe significant effects of building height on ratings of openness.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many cities of developing countries are keen on building urban landmarks to demonstrate their images among world metropolitan groups (Yun 2019). China is no exception in this case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zarghami et al [10] developed a method to study the impact of the form and the physical features of tall buildings on citizens based on Height, width, and height-to-width ratio. Karimimoahaver [11] provided and evaluated different methods of describing a building's visual impact on the city.…”
Section: Tall Buildings and Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%