2001
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/13.4.345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the necessity of hospital stay by means of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol: not quite a different perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies at the university hospital of Maastricht (Smeets, 1997a,b, 2000; Panis, 2002, 2003) evaluated the inappropriate hospital stay and ways to measure it in a valid and reliable way, resulting in the Dutch appropriateness evaluation protocol (DAEP) (see Appendix). This instrument consists of 19 generic (diagnosis‐independent) and explicit (care related) criteria for appropriate hospital stay and a list of reasons for inappropriate stay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies at the university hospital of Maastricht (Smeets, 1997a,b, 2000; Panis, 2002, 2003) evaluated the inappropriate hospital stay and ways to measure it in a valid and reliable way, resulting in the Dutch appropriateness evaluation protocol (DAEP) (see Appendix). This instrument consists of 19 generic (diagnosis‐independent) and explicit (care related) criteria for appropriate hospital stay and a list of reasons for inappropriate stay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%