2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the monitorability of CO2 saturation in subsurface saline aquifers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many tools and techniques at the pilot-and field-scale project have been deployed and tested in the last decade to demonstrate their strengths and weaknesses for CCS monitoring [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Using seismic surveys as a monitoring method has the advantage of covering a large area that can provide information about CO 2 saturation/distribution at locations where no monitoring wells exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many tools and techniques at the pilot-and field-scale project have been deployed and tested in the last decade to demonstrate their strengths and weaknesses for CCS monitoring [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Using seismic surveys as a monitoring method has the advantage of covering a large area that can provide information about CO 2 saturation/distribution at locations where no monitoring wells exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical monitoring data and reservoir characterization data, together, help obtain quantitative estimates necessary for verification of field behaviour against modelling estimates within uncertainty bounds [13]. Geophysical parameter behaviour is dependent on the rock minerology, porosity, pore fluid content, fluid saturations, in-situ temperatures, and pressures [14,15]. The ability of seismic (acoustic) methods to monitor trapped CO2 has been successfully demonstrated in the field however detecting the migrating plume front requires further investigation [16].…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major challenge for laboratory experimental characterization for CCUS is performing the test at in-situ representative pressure and temperatures while accounting for the solubility between the supercritical CO2 (SC-CO2) and water and the properties of the SC-CO2 [12]. There have been multiple studies aimed at characterizing the fluid substitution phenomenon in the lab space [12,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. To replicate CO2 injection into the deep aquifers, most approaches involved injecting dry CO2 gas or CO2-brine solutions into brine saturated rock samples at varied conditions of temperature, pressure, and usually low effective stresses.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of downhole pressure and temperature is the most common monitoring approach. Other methods used by the oil and gas industry to specifically target CO 2 detection include 4‐D seismic, vertical seismic profiles, the reservoir saturation tool (RST), conventional logging techniques, distributed temperature sensors (DTS), and InSAR‐ and GPS‐based methods for surface‐deformation measurements . In addition, some methods – such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and gravity – have been developed or redesigned for monitoring CO 2 plumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%