2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the life-cycle sustainability of algae and bacteria-based wastewater treatment systems: High-rate algae pond and sequencing batch reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although when compared with High-Rate Algae Pound (HRAP), the SBR method is considered to be less efficient economically and for the environment, this is caused by its higher Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Eutrophication Potential (EP) values. Additionally, the gas emission released in the form of N 2 O dominates the active mud system in SBR method (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although when compared with High-Rate Algae Pound (HRAP), the SBR method is considered to be less efficient economically and for the environment, this is caused by its higher Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Eutrophication Potential (EP) values. Additionally, the gas emission released in the form of N 2 O dominates the active mud system in SBR method (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algal based wastewater treatment is more sustainable compared to bacterial based wastewater treatment (Kohlheb et al, 2020). This has been proved by HRAP which is more beneficial than activated sludge based sequencing batch reactors (SBR) both environmentally as well as economically.…”
Section: The Integrated Bacterial-microalgal Approach For Treatment O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the cocultivation of microalgae with bacteria allows for secondary wastewater treatment by the removal of nutrients and organic matter, at reduced costs. These two approaches allow to carry out the treatment of wastewater with microalgae without sterilizing the wastewater [30], while avoiding the economic and energetic costs for the supply of oxygen (O 2 ) for bacteria and CO 2 for microalgae [87][88][89].…”
Section: Secondary Treatment With Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since mechanical aeration causes up to 50% of the operating costs of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). To solve this problem, the cocultivation of microalgae and bacteria could lead to economic and environmental benefits [13,89,90]. Obviously, the benefits are not always clear and effective when moving from laboratory prototypes to an industrial scale [19].…”
Section: Secondary Treatment With Cocultivation Microalgae-bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation