Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons: A Survey Study

Abstract

Objective To explore user-centered design methods currently implemented during development of lower limb wearable robots and how they are utilized during different stages of product development. Background Currently, there appears to be a lack of standardized frameworks for evaluation methods and design requirements to implement effective user-centered design for safe and effective clinical or ergonomic system application. Method Responses from a total of 191 experts working in the field of lower limb exoskeletons were analyzed in this exploratory survey. Descriptive statistics were used to present responses and measures of frequency, and chi-square tests were used to contrast the answers of respondents who identified as clinicians versus engineers. Results A vast majority of respondents involve users in their development, in particular at the initial and iterative stages, although some differences were found between disciplines. A variety of methods and metrics are used to capture feedback from users and test devices, and although valuable, some methods used may not be based on validated measures. Guidelines regarding tests on safety of exoskeletons also lack standardization. Conclusion There seems to be a consensus among experts regarding the importance of a user-centered approach in exoskeleton development; however, standardized frameworks with regard to appropriate testing methods and design approaches are lacking. Such frameworks should consider an interdisciplinary focus on the needs and safety of the intended user during each iteration of the process. Application This exploratory study provides an overview of current practice among engineers and clinicians regarding the user-centered design of exoskeletons. Limitations and recommendations for future directions are identified.

Benchmarking Wearable Robots: Challenges and Recommendations From Functional, User Experience, and Methodological Perspectives

“…Fortunately, the scientific community has already addressed some of these issues in the past two decades: hundreds of studies have explored the biomechanical, physiological, and psychological implications of the interaction between humans and wearable robots (WRs) (Beckerle et al, 2017b , 2019 ; Pinto-Fernandez and Torricelli, 2020 ). This has been a multidisciplinary endeavor, which has resulted not only in scientific evidence and better robotic prototypes, but also in a plethora of potentially useful evaluation methods and protocols (Ghillebert et al, 2019 ; Ármannsdóttir et al, 2020 ; Davis et al, 2020 ). If well-organized and appropriately conveyed to the relevant users, a careful selection of these methods can become the foundation of a unified and standardized benchmarking ecosystem for WRs.…”

Wearable robotic exoskeletons: A socio-philosophical perspective on Duchenne muscular dystrophy research

“…This strategy is supported by recent studies on the acceptance of WREs, which suggest the need for the early involvement of users in the design process and observe that such involvement is becoming a common practice [48]. This idea is also very much present in the concept of Human-or User-Centered Design (UCD) [49].…”

Current Trends and Challenges in Pediatric Access to Sensorless and Sensor-Based Upper Limb Exoskeletons

“…It is widely accepted that a user-centered design approach is preferred to guarantee better acceptability and continuous use of exoskeletons [83]. This design approach generally involves the user in both the initial and iterative stages of the devices' development [84]. Users are able to provide important feedback through questionnaires, interviews, observations, and prototype testing [84].…”