2003
DOI: 10.1017/s1352465803002054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Integrity of Motivational Interviewing Interventions: Reliability of the Motivational Interviewing Skills Code

Abstract: The motivational interviewing skills code (MISC) was used to review 86 audiotaped interactions between clinicians and patients participating in a smoking cessation intervention. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were completed for two of the MISC elements: global evaluations and behavior counts. Results indicate 75% of the global ratings yielded ICCs in the good to excellent range, while only 44% of the behavior counts yielded this level of accuracy. Adherence scores were created to form overall ratings of clinic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
153
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
9
153
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial MI session was 30-45 minutes and the two follow-up sessions were 10-15 minutes. Health coaches were deemed proficient in MI per the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code (MISC) (Moyers, Martin & Catley, 2003). During each session they addressed the participant's risk factor(s) and employed client-centered techniques such as empathic listening, collaboration, evocation, and affirmation in order to establish rapport, reduce resistance, support self-efficacy, and elicit "change talk" (one's own reasons and arguments for change) (Hettema, Steele & Miller, 2005;Miller & Rollnick, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial MI session was 30-45 minutes and the two follow-up sessions were 10-15 minutes. Health coaches were deemed proficient in MI per the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code (MISC) (Moyers, Martin & Catley, 2003). During each session they addressed the participant's risk factor(s) and employed client-centered techniques such as empathic listening, collaboration, evocation, and affirmation in order to establish rapport, reduce resistance, support self-efficacy, and elicit "change talk" (one's own reasons and arguments for change) (Hettema, Steele & Miller, 2005;Miller & Rollnick, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinician fidelity to MI principles and techniques was assessed with the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity coding system (MITI) by an independent rater (Moyers, Martin, Catley, Harris, & Ahluwalia, 2003). The MITI provides two sets of ratings, global ratings of MI Spirit which represents the characteristics of competent MI clinicians (i.e., evocative, collaborative, and autonomy supportive), and counts of MI-related behaviors (i.e., giving information, MI adherent behaviors, MI non-adherent behaviors, closed questions, open questions, simple reflections, complex reflections).…”
Section: Clinicians Intervention and Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 were derived directly from an existing reliable and valid scale of MI called the MITI (Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity) code. 155 MITI consists of three items about collaboration, evocation and autonomy support. Items for the remaining domains were constructed afresh, directly from the content of the learning programme, resulting in an additional global judgement for each of four domains: agenda-setting, 'pros and cons' , 'importance and confidence' and 'goal-setting' .…”
Section: Rating Scale Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting point was a decision to focus on practitioner skills only, given the primary aim of assessing their adherence to the learning programme content. Following the lessons learned in the validation of the MITI scale, 155 a decision was also made to use global ratings of domains rather than actual behaviour counts. It then became a question of what domains to assess and how they might be designed so that raters broadly familiar with MI would be able to listen to a recording, and conduct their assessment.…”
Section: Rating Scale Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation